Founder case study · Feb 25–Aug 20, 2026

Icebreaker cut CPI by 42% while installs stayed nearly flat.

From March to June, monthly Apple Search Ads spend fell 44% while installs declined just 3%. This is the founder's own app, so the numbers and their scope are disclosed below rather than presented as an independent testimonial.

Result at a glance

$1.03 → $0.60
CPI, March to June
537 → 520
Monthly installs
$554.79 → $310.39
Monthly spend
885
Successful agent actions

Across the full 177-day measured period, managed campaigns produced 2,705 installs from $2,018.12 in spend: $0.75 per install.

March versus June

Full monthSpendInstallsCPI
March 2026$554.79537$1.03
June 2026$310.39520$0.60

The account kept essentially the same acquisition volume with a much smaller budget. The result came from many small changes rather than one campaign reset.

What the agent actually did

During the measured period, ASA Agent recorded 885 successful account actions across 59 campaigns. The largest groups were 379 bid changes, 211 negative-keyword additions, 57 campaign pauses, 50 keyword additions, and 26 budget changes.

Analytics and Apple Search Ads modules ran independently, so every optimization used fresh delivery data while reporting remained separate from account changes.

Scope and methodology

  • Source: daily Apple Search Ads campaign reports stored by ASA Agent.
  • Scope: only campaigns after ASA Agent's first successful action on each campaign; unrelated and pre-takeover activity is excluded.
  • Comparison: two complete calendar months, March 1–31 and June 1–30, 2026. Percentages use unrounded source totals.
  • This case evaluates paid acquisition efficiency. It does not claim that lower CPI alone proves higher revenue or profitability.

Put the same workflow on your app

Connect Apple Ads, set the countries and budget, and let the agent handle the recurring analysis and account work.

Get startedAbout ASA Agent